Preparing a primary science or STEM inquiry unit plan

Unit planning is very important. It is something all teachers continue to do throughout their career as a teacher.

To me, unit plans are a great place for teachers to demonstrate their professionalism. To demonstrate their thinking, teachers should treat unit plans as dynamic accounts of their teaching, rather than static records of their intentions. Treating unit plans as dynamic accounts enables teachers to explain what they have done (for others or for the future), justify their plans and decisions, analyse the impact of their actions (for student learning), and evaluate their teaching.

I hope this post helps teachers to develop their unit plans as dynamic accounts and reflect on the purposes of planning and teaching.

Read More

What is the role of curriculum? What makes a quality curriculum?

In a report released on Monday 27 November, 2023, educational reform consultancy Learning First claims to have conducted the first detailed benchmarking of the content of the Australian science curriculum against seven high-performing and comparable systems around the world.  

The claim that this is the first benchmarking activity is just one of many errors in the report, which is rife with unsubstantiated claims, incomplete evidence, and gross assumptions, the most disturbing of which is that more “content” is a key indicator of quality curriculum (with the implication that good teaching is all about transmission of content). 

Learning First is a company that claims to “build relationships… based on honesty, integrity and deep experience and expertise” and whose clients “include federal governments in various parts of the world.” Given their activities and clients, this report is worth scrutiny.  

Read More

Five misconceptions about the curriculum (and what you really need to know)

In my work with teachers in curriculum and pedagogy over the years, I have noticed that several misconceptions about our Australian Curriculum: Science continue to be raised.

These misconceptions include:

  1. The Science understanding strand is the only strand that should be planned for, taught, and assessed

  2. Content elaborations must be taught and assessed

  3. Each content description should be taught as a unit across a whole term

  4. The curriculum is the only thing that should be taught

  5. The goal of the curriculum is to prepare students for senior secondary science classes

Each of these statements is not correct! So what is? Let’s see what’s true.

Read More

Is jelly a liquid or a solid? And why this is a great inquiry question

I’m a big fan of inquiry questions, and some in particular stand out as worth embedding in our teaching. One inquiry question (from the Year 3 year level description in the revised Australian Curriculum: Science) in particular — “Is jelly a liquid or a solid?” — stands out. It’s there to support learning of the Science understanding sub-strand Chemical sciences content description “investigate the observable properties of solids and liquids and how adding or removing heat energy leads to a change of state,” as well as several of the Science inquiry strand content descriptions. Read on to find out why this is such a useful question for driving learning in Year 3…

Read More

What do you do with a PhD?

Someone recently asked me what I had hoped to achieve with my PhD. Whether naivete or idealism, I never aimed to achieve anything with my PhD. I just loved learning. I hoped it would allow me to perform work that was meaningful to me, that I could be passionate about. That work was, and remains, the enabling of teachers, especially primary teachers, to think and teach well.

Read More

You don't need a science degree to teach primary science

A science degree is not necessary for the effective teaching of science to young people. The scientific ideas suggested by the Australian Curriculum: Science can be understood by any interested member of the general population. And every primary teacher is not just any member of the general population! 

Read More

The role of dialogic argumentation in science education for decision-making

A common rationale for science education is that learning science improves decision-making. It is argued that students will develop a strong understanding of the ideas and nature of science, which will inform their decisions. Toward this goal, science classroom activities aim to develop students’ scientific literacy, including their capacity to engage meaningfully with scientific ideas. Ideas about the nature of science are advanced through scientific inquiry, with emphasis on developing students’ capacity to articulate scientific explanations for phenomena. The success of this approach for developing students’ scientific literacy is demonstrated. However, evidence to support the success of this approach for students’ decision-making is scant.

Read More

How to make a school system mediocre

When policy discourse and leadership conversations are framed around those who “can’t,” “won’t,” or “don’t” make decisions to the satisfaction of others, the predictable response is to take away that decision-making agency by prescribing pedagogical practices to them (or to implement a program that impacts on pedagogical practices in a predictable way). Ultimately, these attempts to control the decisions of mediocre teachers reduce the agency of other teachers to make decisions, too.

Read More

Four critical questions to ask when attending education research conferences

Have fun, participate in discussions, share your ideas, and challenge (respectfully) the ideas of others. But most importantly, ask the critical questions of who is speaking (and ask about who is not), question speakers about what they’re claiming and the basis for those claims, look at how the narrative of the conference portrays and constructs education in Australia. Try to uncover who’s paying and what they’re paying for.

Read More